ABitOfBritt on HAES: Health at Every Size

Discover a “Fair Price” For Your Upcoming Medical Procedure

…at Healthcare Bluebook.

I don’t know if the site above is legitimate or not. But I like the idea behind it. Check it out and see what you think.

 

 

Is There a Premium Increase in Your Future: Health Insurers Are Vacuuming Up Details About You

From ProPublica…

“Before the conference, I’d seen a press release announcing that the largest health actuarial firm in the world, Milliman, was now using the LexisNexis scores. I tracked down Marcos Dachary, who works in business development for Milliman. Actuaries calculate health care risks and help set the price of premiums for insurers. I asked Dachary if Milliman was using the LexisNexis scores to price health plans and he said: “There could be an opportunity.”

The scores could allow an insurance company to assess the risks posed by individual patients and make adjustments to protect themselves from losses, he said. For example, he said, the company could raise premiums, or revise contracts with providers. It’s too early to tell whether the LexisNexis scores will actually be useful for pricing, he said. But he was excited about the possibilities. “One thing about social determinants data — it piques your mind,” he said. Dachary acknowledged the scores could also be used to discriminate. Others, he said, have raised that concern. As much as there could be positive potential, he said, “there could also be negative potential.” It’s that negative potential that still bothers data analyst Erin Kaufman, who left the health insurance industry in January. The 35-year-old from Atlanta had earned her doctorate in public health because she wanted to help people, but one day at Aetna, her boss told her to work with a new data set.

To her surprise, the company had obtained personal information from a data broker on millions of Americans. The data contained each person’s habits and hobbies, like whether they owned a gun, and if so, what type, she said. It included whether they had magazine subscriptions, liked to ride bikes or run marathons. It had hundreds of personal details about each person. The Aetna data team merged the data with the information it had on patients it insured. The goal was to see how people’s personal interests and hobbies might relate to their health care costs. But Kaufman said it felt wrong: The information about the people who knitted or crocheted made her think of her grandmother. And the details about individuals who liked camping made her think of herself. What business did the insurance company have looking at this information? “It was a dataset that really dug into our clients’ lives,” she said. “No one gave anyone permission to do this.”

Source: Health Insurers Are Vacuuming Up Details About You —… — ProPublica

Why Your Health Insurer Doesn’t Care About Your Huge Healthcare Bills

Health insurers don’t care because they’re just going to pass the cost on to you and your employer via higher premiums. And the more your employer pays for health insurance fees, the less they can put into your paycheck.

Article like the one linked below make my blood boil.

“After Aetna approved the in-network payment of $70,882 [for a partial hip replacement] (not including the fees of the surgeon and anesthesiologist), Frank’s coinsurance required him to pay the hospital 10 percent of the total.

When Frank called NYU Langone [hospital] to question the charges, the hospital punted him to Aetna, which told him it paid the bill according to its negotiated rates. Neither Aetna nor the hospital would answer his questions about the charges.”

Source: Why Your Health Insurer Doesn’t Care About Your Big… — ProPublica

Here’s a comment left under the article:

I am a physician and have seen these games for years.
It is obvious that the insurers collude with the hospitals and pharmacies, to raise the patients copays.
It is a way of transferring costs onto the consumer.
Each insurance company has a different contract, with each hospital and pharmacy.
For example, I recently needed an MRI. I priced the charges in advance with my local hospital.
If I used my small group blue x policy, I would be charged about $2,200 dollars as my copay. I negotiated to pay the medicare rate in full, and not use my insurance. I paid $240 dollars as the full medicare rate. It was much cheaper for me not to use my insurance, than to use my insurance and pay an inflated copay.

Pharmacies are a little more forthcoming about their pricing, so their games are a little more obvious.
A pharmacy will tell you the price of a drug, but you have to tell them your insurance first.
The chain pharmacies will change the list price for a drug, depending on the insurance.
For example, I told a patient that the silver sulfadiazine cream I was prescribing should cost about $10. The next day they came back furious at me. The local chain pharmacy said it was $440, and their insurance supposedly paid $400, leaving them a copay of $40.

I called around and I found that the full cost at the chain pharmacy without insurance was much less ($35). Walmart had it as one of their $4 drugs. The $440 cream at the chain pharmacy and the $4 cream at Walmart were made by the same generic manufacturer.
I don’t believe that the insurance company was dumb enough to pay $400 dollars for a $4 tube of cream. I think that the list price of the drug was inflated, by mutual agreement between the chain pharmacy and the insurer. By inflating the list price, the patient paid $40 for a $4 tube of cream through their copay. I doubt the insurance company paid anything.

Recipe: Cucumber Salad

Without the avocado (as above), calorie count drops by 140, but who’s counting these days?

This makes three servings.

Ingredients

Protein

12 oz cooked boneless steak, cut into bite-sized pieces

Vinaigrette

2 Tbsp red wine vinegar

6 Tbsp extra virgin olive oil

1 tbsp lemon juice

1/4 tsp salt

pepper to taste

1 tsp celery seeds

2 tsp dried oregano

Salad

2 large cucumbers (8 inches long), peeled or not, sliced and wedged

3 medium tomatoes (4 to 4.5 oz each), diced

1 green bell pepper, diced

1/2 small red onion, thinly sliced

0.5 to 1 oz parsley (about 1/4 of a typical bunch), leaves plucked and chopped, stems discarded

2 oz parmesan cheese (good quality), shredded or shaved

1.5 avocados (California or Haas, dark skin), peeled and sliced or diced

For the lacto-vegetarians in your life (or vegans if you omit the cheese)

Instructions

Start with the vinaigrette. to a small bowl add the vinegar, olive oil, lemon juice, salt, pepper, celery seeds and oregano, then whisk together and set aside.

In a large bowel, mix the cucumber, tomatoes, bell pepper, onion, parsley, and cheese. Then add the vinaigrette and all ingredients gently but thoroughly. Enjoy the steak and avocado on the side or mixed into the salad.

A serving is three cups of salad, 4 oz steak, and 1/2 avocado.

Number of servings: 3

Nutrient Analysis Per Serving (FitDay):

826 calories

Calories from fat: 67%

Calories from protein: 22%

Calories from carbohydrate: 11%

26 carb grams

11 fiber grams

15 grams digestible carb

43 protein grams

Prominent features (70% or more of RDA): Protein, B6, B12, C, iron, phosphorus, selenium, zinc.

Options to consider:

Substitute chicken or shrimp for steak. Substitute other cheese for Parmesan. Sprinkle final product with lemon juice.

The salad alone would be a hit at any potluck dinner

 

Is weight lifting better for heart health than running?

One…..more…..rep!

“Lifting weights is healthier for the heart than going for a run or a walk, new research has found.Scientists looking at the health records of more than 4,000 people have concluded that, while both forms of exercise reduce the risk of developing heart disease, static activities such as weight lifting or press-ups have a greater effect than an equivalent amount of dynamic exercise such as running, walking or cycling.

The research challenges commonly held assumption that so-called “cardiovascular” pursuits like running are of greatest benefit to the heart.”

Source: Weight lifting better for heart health than running, new study finds

I like these findings, but wonder if they can be replicated.

British Medical Journal: Effects of a low carbohydrate diet on energy expenditure during weight loss maintenance

When you read “total energy expenditure” below, it may make more sense if you substitute “calories burned per day.” If you burn your food calories, they don’t end up as stored fat on your body,

“In this controlled feeding trial over 20 weeks, we found that total energy expenditure was significantly greater in participants assigned to a low carbohydrate diet compared with high carbohydrate diet of similar protein content. In addition, pre-weight loss insulin secretion might modify individual response to this diet effect. Taken together with preliminary reports on activation of brain areas involved in food cravings and circulating metabolic fuel concentration, results of the current Framingham State Food Study (FS)2 substantiate several key predictions of the carbohydrate-insulin model. Regardless of the specific mechanisms involved, the study shows that dietary quality can affect energy expenditure independently of body weight, a phenomenon that could be key to obesity treatment, as recently reviewed.”

Source: Effects of a low carbohydrate diet on energy expenditure during weight loss maintenance: randomized trial | The BMJ

Very Low Calorie Meal-Replacement Diets Seem to Be Making a Comeback

“Abstract

Objective

To test the effectiveness and safety of a total diet replacement (TDR) programme for routine treatment of obesity in a primary care setting.Design Pragmatic, two arm, parallel group, open label, individually randomised controlled trial.Setting 10 primary care practices in Oxfordshire, UK.

Participants 278 adults who were obese and seeking support to lose weight: 138 were assigned to the TDR programme and 140 to usual care. 73% of participants were re-measured at 12 months.Interventions The TDR programme comprised weekly behavioural support for 12 weeks and monthly support for three months, with formula food products providing 810 kcal/day (3389 kJ/day) as the sole food during the first eight weeks followed by reintroduction of food. Usual care comprised behavioural support for weight loss from a practice nurse and a diet programme with modest energy restriction.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was weight change at 12 months analysed as intention to treat with mixed effects models. Secondary outcomes included biomarkers of cardiovascular and metabolic risk. Adverse events were recorded.Results Participants in the TDR group lost more weight (−10.7 kg) than those in the usual care group (−3.1 kg): adjusted mean difference −7.2 kg (95% confidence interval −9.4 to −4.9 kg). 45% of participants in the TDR group and 15% in the usual care group experienced weight losses of 10% or more. The TDR group showed greater improvements in biomarkers of cardiovascular and metabolic risk than the usual care group. 11% of participants in the TDR group and 12% in the usual care group experienced adverse events of moderate or greater severity.

Conclusions

Compared with regular weight loss support from a practice nurse, a programme of weekly behavioural support and total diet replacement providing 810 kcal/day seems to be tolerable, and leads to substantially greater weight loss and greater improvements in the risk of cardiometabolic disease.”

Source: Doctor Referral of Overweight People to Low Energy total diet replacement Treatment (DROPLET): pragmatic randomised controlled trial | The BMJ

Vegetarian Diets Are Linked to Reduced Cardiometabolic Risk Factors among South Asians in the United States 

Results

Thirty-eight percent of the cohort participants were classified as vegetarian. Vegetarians reported more frequent weekly eating occasions of whole grains (median frequency/wk: 10 compared with 9, P = 0.012) and beans and legumes (median frequency/wk: 8.5 compared with 5.1, P < 0.001), and less frequent weekly eating occasions of sweets and desserts (median frequency/wk: 1.9 compared with 2.3, P < 0.001). Consuming a vegetarian diet was associated with lower body mass index (P = 0.023), fasting glucose (P = 0.015), insulin resistance (P = 0.003), total cholesterol (P = 0.027), and LDL cholesterol (P = 0.004), and lower odds of fatty liver (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.78, P = 0.006). The odds of having any coronary artery calcium were lower for vegetarian men (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.87, P = 0.013); however, no significant associations were observed among women.

Conclusions

Among US South Asians, a vegetarian diet was associated with fewer cardiometabolic risk factors overall and with less subclinical atherosclerosis among men.

Source: Vegetarian Diets Are Associated with Selected Cardiometabolic Risk Factors among Middle-Older Aged South Asians in the United States | The Journal of Nutrition | Oxford Academic

HHS Releases New Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans

“The United States currently has low levels of adherence to the guidelines — only 26 percent of men, 19 percent of women, and 20 percent of adolescents meet the recommendations. According to the guidelines, these low levels of physical activity among Americans have health and economic consequences for the nation, with nearly $117 billion dollars in annual healthcare costs and 10 percent of all premature mortality attributable to failure to meet levels of aerobic physical activity recommended in the guidelines. Adults need 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic activity each week, with muscle strengthening activities on two days during the week to stay healthy. Youth ages 6 through 17 need 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity each day.”

Source: HHS Releases Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition | HHS.gov