Should We Ration ICU Beds and Ventilators to #Coronavirus #COVID19 Patients?

Artist’s rendition of Coronavirus

Previously I shared with you some data from two hospitals in Wuhan, China, regarding their experience with COVID-19 as of Jan 31, 2020.

Something led me back to that study and on closer review I found shocking numbers. The report outlines their experience with 191 hospitalized patients. 137 were eventually discharged. 54 died.

Here’s the shocker: Of the 54 who died, 32 required mechanical ventilation. Of those 32, 31 died. That’s a 97% mortality rate if you end up on a ventilator in China.

I readily admit I know nothing about the quality of medical care anywhere in China. Nor do I know if we can trust the data coming out of China.

If a therapeutic modality has a 97% failure rate, that’s awfully close to being futile. Physicians have no obligation to offer futile “therapy” to patients. Before the U.S. ramps up production of an extra several hundred thousand ventilators,  maybe we need to re-think that. What I don’t know offhand is, what is the Italian experience with COVID-19 patients on ventilators. If it’s just as poor as China’s, should we even be offering ventilators to patients? Don’t forget, every ventilator patient takes up an ICU bed and ventilator that might be needed for a patient—maybe you or someone you love—with a much higher survival rate.

I’ve heard anecdotal reports of U.S. COVID-19 patients getting off ventilators alive and walking out of the hospital. But anecdotes are not hard data. Italy has a lot of experience with this issue. What are their survival rates after intubation and mechanical ventilation? Or ECMO? I’ll let you know when I find out. If you know now, please leave a comment below.

The time may come in the very near future that physicians have to tell 80-year-old patients with heart failure and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and now COVID-19 that we won’t put them on a mechanical ventilator because their chance of survival is zero, or no ventilator is available. Sad.

Anxiously awaiting more data.

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS: Of the three Chinese patients given ECMO, all died.

Steve Parker MD, Advanced Mediterranean Diet

Click the pic to purchase at Amazon.com. E-book versions also available at Smashwords. com.

 

Should Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin Be Considered the Standard of Care for #Coronavirus #COVID19 ?

Artist’s rendition of Coronavirus

In a word: No.

Scientists and physicians are furiously looking for existing drugs that fight coronavirus (COVID-19). The combo of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin showed promise in a French population.

These are my personal notes after reading the article below. They will bore you, so move along.

These researchers say hydroxychloroquine is generally safer and less toxic than chloroquine, a similar drug that had been used as a COVID-19 treatment in China (IIRC, 500 mg by mouth twice daily).

Contraindications to use of hydyroxychloroquine include G6PD deficiency (more common in Mediterranean populations that in the U.S.) , retinopathy, QT prolongation. Azithromycin and can also prolong QT interval, so  daily EKGs were done on these patients.

In lab studies, azithromycin seems to inhibit Zika and Ebola viruses. And it tends to prevent bacterial infections (pneumonia, sinusitis, pharyngitis?) that sometimes soon follow a virus infection.

Study Population

Twenty adult patients who were hospitalized, six of whom had no symptoms. (So why were they hospitalized? Authors don’t say.) Most of the patients with symptoms had upper respiratory tract symptoms (sore throat, runny nose, sinus congestion, or isolated low-grade fever and myalgias). The others had lower respiratory tract symptoms (symptoms of pneumonia or bronchitis, which will always include cough). The latter all had CT-confirmed pneumonia.

Hydroxychloroquine dose was 200 mg three times daily for 10 days. Twenty-six patients (average age 52) received the drug; six were deleted from analysis because they quit the drug. Of the 20 remaining, six received Z-pak to prevent super-infection (a bacterial infection along with the virus). How they chose who  got azith was not specified. The control patients (16) were others in various other hospitals (or clinics?).

Three of the 36 original enrollees were “lost to follow-up” because they were transferred to the ICU.

Results

Patients receiving the combo of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin demonstrated greater rates of negative viral testing (via PCR) in nasopharyngeal swabs, in only three to six days in most patients. Note: averaged duration of viral shedding  in China was 20 days.

I saw no mention in the text about other real-world clinical outcomes such as death rates, decreased hospitalization length of stay, number of days before becoming symptom-free, etc.

My Assessment

This was a tiny pilot study that shows promise. Results my not be reproducible. Of course, we need a much larger study. If the drugs are widely available, I’d consider the combo as a treatment, particularly for the elderly or others at high risk of serious illness from COVID-19. This combo certainly CANNOT be considered the standard of care for this illness at this time. I’m surprised the authors are recommending it now, in the absence of any other proven effective anti-viral drugs.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Update on March 23, 2020: Dr David Gorski did a much more extensive and erudite fisking of the article. I highly recommend it to you if you have a medical or scientific background. I think he’d agree with my assessment. After reading his, I’m even less likely to prescribe the combo. He also discusses chloroquine, a relative of hydroxychloroquine.

Reference: Gautret et al (2020). Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as treatment for COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized trial. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents – in press March 17, 2020 – DOI 10.1016/jinjantimicag.2020.105949

Steve Parker MD, Advanced Mediterranean Diet

Click the pic to purchase at Amazon.com. E-book versions also available at Smashwords. com.

How to Tell If You Have a Serious Case of #Coronavirus #COVID19 and Whether You Should Go to the Hospital

An oxygen saturation monitor. Top number is O2 sat, bottom number is heart rate.

On Feb 26, 2020, I published and article on how to prepare your household for Coronavirus (COVID-19). I have a few more thoughts. How about an oxygen saturation monitor (aka pulse oximeter) and supplemental oxygen?

Most of the victims of this pandemic will be treating themselves at home. Just like most flu sufferers are treated at home, not the hospital, and do well. However, COVID-19 seems to be more serious if not lethal, particularly for those with particular pre-existing conditions.

A Little Cardiopulmonary Physiology

Your heart pumps blood to your lungs to blow off carbon dioxide and pick up oxygen for delivery to your tissues, to keep them alive and functioning well. Your arterial blood typically carries a lot of oxygen, but there’s a limit to how much it can hold. With a healthy cardiopulmonary system, your blood carries 94–99% of all the oxygen your blood could hold. That number is called your “oxygen saturation” or, among medical workers, “O2 sat.” Diseases in either the heart or lungs can impair your blood’s ability to carry oxygen, so your oxygen saturation may go down.

How Does COVID-19 Kill?

All the tissues in your body—some tissues more than others—need a steady supply of oxygen. Without oxygen, they die. Viral-induced inflammation in the lungs impairs oxygen delivery to your tissues. It’s not always that simple, but that’s all you need to know for now.

The earliest warnings of possible life-threatening coronavirus infection typically are shortness-of-breath and increased respiratory rate. Heart rate is usually higher, too. These are indicators that your body is working harder to get enough oxygen. That’s because the virus-induced lung inflammation partially blocks the transfer of oxygen from the atmosphere to the bloodstream.

Respiratory rate is your number of breaths per minute. A normal respiratory rate for an adult at rest is between 12 and 20. One breath is one inspiration and one expiration. Click to see a nurse teaching how to measure respiratory rate.

Artist’s rendition of coronavirus

How Do You Know If You Might Be Getting Into Serious Trouble With Coronavirus Or Any Other Lung Infection?

Your respiratory rate will be significantly elevated, approaching or above 30/minute, and/or your oxygen saturation will be under 92–93%. Your heart rate may be over 110 beats per minute, too. If you go to a hospital emergency department with breathing trouble, they will always check your oxygen saturation. If it’s under 92%, you’ll get supplemental oxygen to get you back up to at least 92%. And there’s a good chance you’ll be admitted to the hospital partly because it’s usually impossible to get oxygen delivered to the home in a timely fashion. If you have your own oxygen saturation monitor at home, you may be able to avoid an emergency department or urgent care visit if your O2 sat is over 92%.

What I’m reading online from other physicians is that COVID-19 patients tend to have lower O2 sats than they expected just from eyeballing the patient and looking at heart and respiratory rates.

If you have signs and symptoms of COVID-19 plus a respiratory rate 30 or higher, or oxygen saturation under 92-93%, seek medical attention immediately,

Emergency Departments and urgent care centers may soon be overwhelmed with coronavirus patients. Some will need to be admitted (assuming a bed is even available) and others can safely be sent home. In addition to vital signs and the overall appearance of the patient, a deciding factor for admission will often be oxygen saturation level. If too many patients that don’t need a hospital  level of care clog up the system, then other seriously ill folks will get delayed medical care, or none at all. 

That being said, if you think you need to go the emergency department or urgent care center, then go. Or talk to your personal physician first. I’m not your physician and don’t know the details of your case. I don’t want to be responsible for someone dying because they delayed or didn’t seek care because of what they read here.

What Can the Hospital Do For You If You Have COVID-19 Infection?

At first, it’s just going to be supplemental oxygen. That’s about it. We have no effective anti-viral drugs yet. Chloroquine, remdesivir, or other drugs might eventually pan out, but we don’t know as of March 20 2020. If things go south after admission, you’ll be put into a medically-induced coma and placed on a mechanical ventilator (if one’s even available), or get ECMO. Odds of death at this point are 50% or higher. If you go into shock (low blood pressure), drugs to raise blood pressure will be given, usually in the ICU (intensive care  unit), assuming a bed is available. Some COVID-19 patients will develop a bacterial infection on top of the virus, in which case antibiotics will be given.

So Is There Any Other Equipment I Need to Consider Acquiring In View of the Coronavirus Pandemic?

Yes….especially if you have risk factors for serious illness from COVID-19:

  1. A pulse oximeter. I mentioned this to my wife about six days ago, so she went online, checked reviews, and chose the Onyx Vantage model 9590 finger pulse oximeter by Nonin, in the photo above. This is not my personal endorsement. She got a great deal on ours, $30 or less, perhaps because I’m a medical professional. Not sure of her source (McKesson?). I just check the price at Amazon and was shocked to see it priced at $139. I know several hospital nurses that purchased their own oximeters at local pharmacies for $40 or less (before onset of the pandemic).
  2. A home oxygen supply. I know of only two options, One is an oxygen tank with nasal cannula tubing. Cost is unknown to me. I don’t know if you can get this without a doctor’s prescription. It’s dangerous if you don’t get instructions; you can blow yourself up or cause a fire. Oxygen is highly flammable. See the Apollo 1 conflagration of 1967. Option #2 is an oxygen concentrator device. The atmosphere is 21% oxygen; most of the rest is nitrogen. This device somehow concentrates oxygen and delivers it via nasal cannula at a concentration greater than 21%. I don’t know how much they cost, but I’m guessing several hundred or a thousand dollars. I don’t know if you can get one without a doctor’s prescription. Like oxygen from a tank, it can be dangerous if you don’t have instructions.

Stay tuned to various medical sources because the coronavirus situation changes on a daily basis.

May God bless us all, even if we don’t deserve it (and we don’t).

Steve Parker, M.D.

Steve Parker MD, Advanced Mediterranean Diet

Click the pic to purchase at Amazon.com. E-book versions also available at Smashwords. com.

How to Prepare Your Household for the #Coronavirus Pandemic #COVID19

Elderly couple hoping to avoid inhalation of coronavirus

This is a reproduction of a post I made on one of my other blogs on Feb 26, 2020. If you have failed to prepare, it’s probably too late by now. I’m trying to consolidate all my coronavirus (COVID-19) posting here.

What I would add now is that you consider acquiring a pulse oximeter (aka oxygen saturation monitor) and a home oxygen supply (see a future post).

*  *  *

I hadn’t been too concerned about coronavirus (COVID-19), but then I read about quarantined towns in northern Italy. I’m still not terribly worried for my own health, even if I end up treating cases at the hospital. I’m 65—a risk factor for viral death—but otherwise healthy, thank God! There’s still a good chance this will blow over and not affect the U.S. in a major way. [That horse is already out of the barn!]

BUT…

If coronavirus becomes an epidemic in the U.S., you will want to be prepared. You’ll want to avoid unnecessary contact with others, especially if you’re over 65 or have significant chronic medical conditions like heart disease, COPD, asthma, active cancer, impaired liver or kidney function, or a poor immune system (e.g, cancer chemotherapy).

If your city or neighborhood is quarantined, will supply trucks be allowed through the checkpoints? Will drivers be willing to enter the quarantine zone? I’ve started to call Wal-Mart, “China-Mart.” Because is it seems like at least half the goods there are made in China. China’s industrial output has already been reduced by the coronavirus epidemic there. A significant number of prescription drugs in the U.S. depend on a healthy China.

A severe coronavirus outbreak in the U.S. might mean you need to hunker down at home, or close to it, for one or two months. So consider stocking up on the following items to last for 4–6 weeks. The good new is, you’ll eventually use most of this anyway.

  • various foods with a long shelf-life
  • face masks (you’re too late; this ship has already sailed)
  • toilet paper
  • paper towels
  • over-the-counter cold and flu remedies
  • acetaminophen
  • ibuprofen
  • throat lozenges
  • antiseptic wipes
  • toothpaste
  • a multivitamin
  • hand sanitizer
  • facial tissues
  • important prescription medicines (you may need to call your doctor for a three-month supply)
  • body soap
  • dishwashing and clothing detergents
  • feminine hygeine products
  • household cleaning products

Have I missed anything?

Steve Parker, M.D.

Update on March 3, 2020: hand sanitizer (60+% alcohol)

Antibody Test for #Coronavirus May Soon Be Available #COVID19

Artist’s rendition of coronavirus

When we’re exposed to an infection, our bodies produce antibodies to help us fight off the germ before it kills us. Scientists are developing antibody blood tests to see who has already had Coronavirus (COVID-19) and survived it

From MIT Technology Review:

The Icahn team, led by virologist Florian Krammer, says the new test could help locate survivors, who could then donate their antibody-rich blood to people in ICUs to help boost their immunity.

What’s more, doctors, nurses, and health-care workers could learn if they’ve already been exposed. Those who have, assuming they are now immune, Krammer suggests, could safely rush to the front lines and perform the riskiest tasks—like intubating a person with the virus, without worrying about getting infected or bringing the disease home to their families.

Source: This blood test can tell us how widespread coronavirus really is – MIT Technology Review

Healthcare workers  who have been infected and survived probably don’t need PPE (personal protective equipment), which is in short supply.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Steve Parker MD, Advanced Mediterranean Diet

Click the pic to purchase at Amazon.com. E-book versions also available at Smashwords. com.

Nearly All of the Italians Who Have Died From #Coronavirus #COVID19 Had Pre-Existing Conditions

Artist’s rendition of Coronavirus

Bloomberg has a March 18, 2020, article on the Italian deaths from Coronavirus, aka COVID-19. From the article:

More than 99% of Italy’s coronavirus fatalities were people who suffered from previous medical conditions, according to a study by the country’s national health authority.

After deaths from the virus reached more than 2,500, with a 150% increase in the past week, health authorities have been combing through data to provide clues to help combat the spread of the disease.

The Italian national health authority has reviewed medical records of 18% of those who have died, hoping to find out why the Italian mortality rate is so high.

Interesting factoids from the Italian experience:

  • median age of those infected was 63 (overall, or just those hospitalized?)
  • all the deceased victims under 40 were males with serious underlying conditions
  • nearly 1/2 of the deceased had three or more pre-existing conditions
  • one quarter of the deceased had two other pre-existing illnesses
  • one quarter of the deceased had one other pre-existing illnesses
  • average age of the deceased was 79.5

I don’t have details of the pre-existing conditions except: “More than 75% had high blood pressure, about 35% had diabetes and a third suffered from heart disease.”

Click for my list of underlying conditions that increase the risk of death from COVID-19  and what you should do if they apply to you.

I still don’t understand how a prior diagnosis of hypertension increases risk of death. Maybe it doesn’t. It could just be a statistical marker. As they say, correlation is not causation. Or many folks with hypertension actually have underlying hypertensive heart disease. Or drugs that treat hypertension impair the immune system’s defense against the virus.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Steve Parker MD, Advanced Mediterranean Diet

Click the pic to purchase at Amazon.com. E-book versions also available at Smashwords. com.

 

Higher Risk of Death in China From #COVID19 #Coronavirus Linked to Age, Diabetes, Hypertension, Coronary Artery Disease, and COPD

Artist’s rendition of coronavirus

The Lancet published a report on the outcomes of Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection in two Wuhan, China, hospitals as of Jan 31, 2020.

  • Those who died of the infection had higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
  • Average age of those who died was 69. Survivors’ average age was 52.
  • Men were more likely to be hospitalized than women.

Details from the report:

191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients). Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03–1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61–12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64–128·55; p=0·0033) on admission. Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0–24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors. The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Steve Parker MD, Advanced Mediterranean Diet

Click the pic to purchase at Amazon.com. E-book versions also available at Smashwords. com.

 

 

Be Particularly Wary of #CoronaVirus If You Have Any of These Conditions #COVID-19

“Am I gonna make it, doc?”

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control website notes that the you are at risk for serious—even life-threatening—illness from Coronavirus if you are over age 60–65 or have a serious chronic medical condition, like…

  • heart disease
  • diabetes
  • kidney disease
  • lung disease

Well, there are at least a couple hundred heart diseases, a couple hundred kidney diseases, a couple hundred lung diseases, and at least three kinds of diabetes. There are entire thick medical textbooks written specifically for heart disease, lung disease, and kidney disease. All of those individual diseases don’t make you particularly vulnerable to Coronavirus.

And what’s a “serious condition?” Doctors don’t always tell you how serious a disorder is, and patients don’t always hear and remember when the doctor does. So you have a heart murmur. It’s likely chronic but is it serious? It depends.

I’ve even seen hypertension listed as a risk factor for serious flu complications, but I don’t believe it.

And what’s chronic? Say five years ago you had a mild heart attack, a stent was put in the only blocked artery, you take your prescribed drugs, and your doctor told you last month you’re doing great. Do you still have a serious chronic medical ailment?

By the way, physicians are calling the disease caused by Coronavirus “COVID-19.”

Is Age Really Important?

Yes. Here’s a chart from the report of UK’s Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team dated March 16, 2020:

Age-specific hospitalization and ICU admission rates from the Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team

TL;DR version: The need for hospitalization and ICU (intensive care unit) admission starts to rise dramatically for patients aged 50-59 and shoots up from there. If you make it into the ICU with COVID-19, you’ll quite likely have a tube down your throat and be on a ventilator (a mechanical “breathing machine”), or getting ECMO.

BTW, the Response Team figures you have only a 50:50 chance of surviving if you end up on a ventilator.

How Do I Know If I Have a Serious Chronic Medical Condition?

If you’re uncertain, the answer should come from your personal medical specialist or primary care physician. I know many of you will be unsure.

Here’s a simple test you can do to see if you might have a serious chronic medical condition:

  • Walk up two flights of stairs without stopping

If you can’t do that without stopping to rest and without much shortness-of-breath (you should be able to carry on a conversation): you flunk. Possible explanations (among many) include serious heart or lung disease, being badly overweight, or just “out of shape” from lack of regular exercise. A couple of those conditions you can rectify, and should.

Artist’s rendition of Coronavirus (plus red blood cells, which in reality are orders of magnitude larger than viruses)

If You Have One of the Following Conditions, You Need to Be Extra Careful When Coronavirus Is Around

Having practiced medicine for over three decades—and I’ll keep practicing until I get it right—here’s my current list of conditions that raise your risk of serious disease if you contract Coronavirus:

  • age over 60–65 (may not be much of a risk factor if you are otherwise healthy, physically fit, and eat well)
  • needing supplemental oxygen at home, whether continuously, at night only, or just as needed
  • moderate or severe valvular heart disease, whether the valve is leaky or blocked
  • a weak heart muscle called cardiomyopathy with left ventricular ejection fraction under 50% or on home oxygen
  • history of congestive heart failure with current left ventricular ejection fraction under 50% or on home oxygen
  • moderate to severe diastolic heart failure (sometimes call “heart failure with preserved ejection fraction”)
  • serious coronary artery disease (e.g., frequent chest pains, multiple heart attacks, residual blockages in arteries)
  • asthma that requires daily drugs or that has frequent or severe exacerbations (the CDC says “moderate to sever asthma”)
  • COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) or emphysema requiring daily scheduled drugs or frequent “as needed” drugs or home oxygen
  • chronic liver disease (such as cirrhosis) with serum bilirubin over 2.0 mg/dL or albumin under 3.0 g/dL or elevated prothrombin time
  • serious active cancer, particularly if on chemotherapy that suppresses the immune system
  • prior organ transplant requiring immunosuppressive drug therapy to prevent organ rejection
  • immunoglobulin deficiency
  • very sedentary lifestyle
  • poor nutrition and/or malnutrition
  • morbid obesity (CDC says severe obesity: body mass index 40 or greater)
  • body mass index over 35
  • on chronic corticosteroid therapy
  • end-stage renal disease on dialysis
  • chronic kidney disease with serum creatinine over 2 mg/dL
  • nephrotic syndrome
  • diabetes mellitus, especially if poorly controlled and/or concomittant chronic organ impairment such as nephropathy, neuropathy, or retinopathy
  • active autoimmune disease (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosis, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease), particularly if on drug therapy that impairs immune system function
  • chronic low white blood cell count
  • chronic active infection (e.g., tuberculosis, hepatitis, AIDS)
  • smoker?
  • you “always catch what’s going around” (possible immune system disorder or poor hygeine?)

Why Do These Conditions Increase Risk of Serious Illness?

Many of these infirmities impair your immune system and increase your risk of serious complications from any infection, whether viral, bacterial, or fungal. Just as importantly, these disorders may impair your body’s ability to respond to the increased physical stress of infection. Clearly, the more of these ailments you have, the greater your chance of a bad outcome.

Here’s the problem when you come down with flu or any other infection. The infection increases the workload on various organ systems that keep you alive day in and day out. Even if you take an antibiotic or anti-viral drug, you still need various organ systems to keep you alive. I’m thinking particularly about your lungs, cardiovascular, and immune systems, working together at maximal capacity. You heart, for example, pumps about five liters of blood every minute while you’re at rest, blood that’s carrying life-preserving oxygen to all your other organs in addition to the heart muscle. That blood also carries a waste product—carbon dioxide—to your lungs for delivery to the outside world. If you exercise vigorously your heart increases it’s pumping output to twenty liters a minute, if you’re young and healthy. By the same token, your lungs have a certain but limited capacity to take up oxygen from the air and blow off carbon dioxide both at rest and during exercise. As we age, the capacity the heart and lungs to do their jobs diminishes no matter what. Same with the immune system. That’s why folks over 60 are at risk for serious complications from viral and other infections. Because infections increase the workload on the heart, lungs, and immune system. When Coronavirus infects your lungs, fluid and inflammatory debris builds up in the gas-exchanging tissues, impairing your ability to absorb oxygen from the air. So your lungs and heart have to work harder, and long enough for your immune system to eradicate there virus.

I hope you find this list more helpful than CDC’s. Nevertheless, I’m sure it’s incomplete. I’m not trying to scare you. I’m trying to help you survive the pandemic, as most of us will. Forewarned in forearmed.

If You Have One or More of the Listed Conditions, What Does “Being Extra Careful Around Coronavirus” Mean?

Avoid the virus if at all possible. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and state governments have been issuing guidelines. One major issue is that the virus incubates in the body without symptoms for 5–7 days, and the affected individual may be infectious—shedding the virus that could get into you if you’re nearby—for 24 hours or so before the virus carrier even knows they’re sick. For folks that get sick with the virus, symptoms last for 1–2 weeks, and their oral or respiratory secretions (and feces? tears?) could infect you if the they enter your body via the mouth, nose, or eyes (or gastrointestinal tract?). Even after recovery, infected individuals can shed infectious virus for about a week. Further complicating the situation is that infected individuals may just have mild symptoms like a cough (or runny nose or sneezing?), and won’t be quarantining themselves or avoiding other people. They won’t know they have the virus. Other people can harbor the virus in their bodies and never feel sick—we don’t know how infectious these folks are. So what specifically can you do if you have risk factors for serious disease?

  • Monitor your local news reports to know how common is the virus in your community. If there’s an outbreak there or where your’e going…
  • Avoid crowds (0f 10 people? 50?)
  • Stay home as much as possible.
  • Don’t be around people with symptoms of possible COVID-19: c0ugh, shortness of breath, fever, ?sneezing, ?runny nose. Sure, they could just have common illnesses like bronchitis, pneumonia, hay fever, allergies, the common cold, or a sinus infection. You just don’t know. The virus won’t get into your residence unless you allow an infected person in.
  • Avoid touching high-touch surfaces in public places, like hand rails, elevator buttons, door handles, handshakes, etc. If you must touch, cover the surface with a tissue or disinfect it first.
  • Wash your hands frequently with soap and water. Particularly after touching high-touch surfaces in public places.
  • Avoid cruises, mass transit, air travel. Again: crowds.
  • If you can’t avoid someone who’s coughing or sneezing, offer them a surgical mask.
  • Don’t touch your mouth, nose, or eyes. That’s how germs on your hands can enter you.

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS: It’s still very early in this pandemic and there’s much we don’t know. Some of the above information is probably wrong. Stay tuned.

Updated on March 30, 2020, after reading this from the CDC. (I wonder if someone there read my post.) If memory serves, the original CDC fact sheet listed hypertension as a risk factor for serious illness, but that’s gone now.

Steve Parker MD, Advanced Mediterranean Diet

Click the pic to purchase at Amazon.com. E-book versions also available at Smashwords. com.

 

Low-Carb Diets Improve Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors

Even with the mandarin oranges, this salad is low-carb

A meta-analysis by Chinese investigators found that low-carb diets improve cardiovascular risk factors. Specifically: body weight (lowered), triglycerides (lowered), HDL-cholesterol (raised), blood pressure (lowered systolic and diastolic, but less than 2 points).

Additionally, they found increases in total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol. Some consider those to be going in the wrong direction, increasing cardiovascular risk. The study authors, however, considered these increases “slight,” implying lack of real-world significance.

I’ll not fisk the entire research paper. Have a go at it yourself by clicking the link to full-text below.

The researchers included 12 randomized controlled trials in their analysis. They defined low-carb diets as having less than 40% of calories derived from carbohydrates. If you’re eating 2200 calories a day, 39% of calories from carb would be 215 g of carbs/day. That’s a lot of carb, and wouldn’t be much lower than average in the U.S.. I scanned the report pretty quickly and didn’t run across an overall average for carb grams or calories in the low-carb diets. The “control diets” had 45–55% of calories from carbohydrate.

Here’s the abstract:

Background

Low-carbohydrate diets are associated with cardiovascular risk factors; however, the results of different studies are inconsistent.

Purpose

The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the relationship between low-carbohydrate diets and cardiovascular risk factors.

Method

Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library) were searched from their inception to November 2018. We collected data from 12 randomized trials on low-carbohydrate diets including total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, and blood pressure levels, as well as weight as the endpoints. The average difference (MD) was used as the index to measure the effect of a low-carbohydrate diet on cardiovascular risk factors with a fixed-effects model or random-effects model. The analysis was further stratified by factors that might affect the results of the intervention.

Results

From 1292 studies identified in the initial search results, 12 randomized studies were included in the final analysis, which showed that a low-carbohydrate diet was associated with a decrease in triglyceride levels of -0.15mmol/l (95% confidence interval -0.23 to -0.07). Low-carbohydrate diet interventions lasting less than 6 months were associated with a decrease of -0.23mmol/l (95% confidence interval -0.32 to -0.15), while those lasting 12–23 months were associated with a decrease of -0.17mmol/l (95% confidence interval -0.32 to -0.01). The change in the body weight in the observation groups was -1.58kg (95% confidence interval -1.58 to -0.75); with for less than 6 months of intervention, this change was -1.14 kg (95% confidence interval -1.65 to -0.63),and with for 6–11 months of intervention, this change was -1.73kg (95% confidence interval -2.7 to -0.76). The change in the systolic blood pressure of the observation group was -1.41mmHg (95% confidence interval—2.26 to -0.56); the change in diastolic blood pressure was -1.71mmHg (95% confidence interval—2.36 to -1.06); the change in plasma HDL-C levels was 0.1mmHg (95% confidence interval 0.08 to 0.12); and the change in serum total cholesterol was 0.13mmol/l (95% confidence interval 0.08 to 0.19). The plasma LDL-C level increased by 0.11mmol/l (95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.19), and the fasting blood glucose level changed 0.03mmol/l (95% confidence interval -0.05 to 0.12),which was not significant.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis confirms that low-carbohydrate diets have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk factors but that the long-term effects on cardiovascular risk factors require further research.

Source: The effects of low-carbohydrate diets on cardiovascular risk factors: A meta-analysis

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS: You know what else reduces cardiovascular disease risk? The Mediterranean diet. The book below has a low-carb option. It’s two diets for the price of one.

Steve Parker MD, Advanced Mediterranean Diet

Click the pic to purchase at Amazon.com. E-book versions also available at Smashwords. com.

Which Dietary Patterns Lower Blood Pressure?

Not a bad monitor

Increasingly, I’m suspicious of results from meta-analyses. Anyway, here’s the abstract of one from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in 2020. In case you’re not familiar with the LDL-lowering, vegetarian, “portfolio diet,” click for an infographic.

Background: Many systematic reviews and meta-analyses have assessed the efficacy of dietary patterns on blood pressure (BP) lowering but their findings are largely conflicting.

Objective: This umbrella review aims to provide an update on the available evidence for the efficacy of different dietary patterns on BP lowering.

Methods: PubMed and Scopus databases were searched to identify relevant studies through to June 2020. Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible if they measured the effect of dietary patterns on systolic (SBP) and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels. The methodological quality of included systematic reviews was assessed by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Review version 2. The efficacy of each dietary pattern was summarized qualitatively. The confidence of the effect estimates for each dietary pattern was graded using the NutriGrade scoring system.

Results: Fifty systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs were eligible for review. Twelve dietary patterns namely the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), Mediterranean, Nordic, vegetarian, low-salt, low-carbohydrate, low-fat, high-protein, low glycemic index, portfolio, pulse, and Paleolithic diets were included in this umbrella review. Among these dietary patterns, the DASH diet was associated with the greatest overall reduction in BP with unstandardized mean differences ranging from -3.20 to -7.62 mmHg for SBP and from -2.50 to -4.22 mmHg for DBP. Adherence to Nordic, portfolio, and low-salt diets also significantly decreased SBP and DBP levels. In contrast, evidence for the efficacy of BP lowering using the Mediterranean, vegetarian, Paleolithic, low-carbohydrate, low glycemic index, high-protein, and low-fat diets was inconsistent.

Conclusion: Adherence to the DASH, Nordic, and portfolio diets effectively reduced BP. Low-salt diets significantly decreased BP levels in normotensive Afro-Caribbean people and in hypertensive patients of all ethnic origins.

Source: Efficacy of different dietary patterns on lowering of blood pressure level: an umbrella review – PubMed

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS: Losing a significant amount of excess weight by any reasonable method commonly lowers blood pressure.

front cover of paleobetic diet

Click to purchase at Amazon.com. E-book also available at Smashwords. com.