Category Archives: Weight Loss

Prepare For Weight Loss, Part 6: Weight Goals

“This thing must be broken!”

Despite all the chatter about how to lose weight, few talk about how much should be lost.

If you are overweight, deciding how much weight you should lose is not as simple as it seems at first blush. I rarely have to tell a patient she’s overweight. She knows it and has an intuitive sense of whether it’s mild, moderate, or severe in degree. She’s much less clear about how much weight she should lose. If it’s any consolation, clinicians in the field aren’t always sure either.

Five weight standards have been in common usage over the last quarter-century:

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Height and Weight Tables from 1983
  2. Aesthetic Ideal Weights
  3. USDA/HHS Healthy Weights
  4. Realistic Weights
  5. Body Mass Index.

The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Weight Tables list desirable or ideal weights that were felt at one time to be associated with maximum longevity. We know now that populations can be a bit heavier than the Metropolitan weights without impairment of health or longevity. The tables were controversial right out of the gate and are little used now; I mention them for historical interest.

Aesthetic Ideal Weights are somewhat personal, although clearly influenced by culture. You know without much thought at what weight you look your best. Whether others agree with you, and whether you could realistically hope to reach that weight, are entirely different matters.

If your personal Aesthetic Ideal Weight matches the Hollywood hunk or sex kitten actress du jour, prepare for failure. Thespians and models want to be thin because the camera puts weight on them. Many of our beloved photogenic celebrities workout three hours daily with a personaal trainer. And on top of that , many visit plastic surgeons.

I suggest you find a friend with your type of body frame and height who looks “normal” and healthy to you. What does he or she weigh? I also suggest validation of your Aesthetic Ideal Weight by a trusted adviser. Now you’ve got something to shoot for.

In 1995, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a chart of Suggested Healthy Weight ranges. By the turn of the century, the USDA/HHS’s Dietary Guidelines for Americans had abandoned the Healthy Weight table, recommending the use of BMI instead.

A Realistic Weight goal is one that you have a reasonable expectation of achieving, accompanied by significant psychological or medical benefits. This standard is flexible. There is no weight chart to consult since your potential psychological or medical benefits are unique. These weights tend to be higher than the other benchmarks thus far reviewed.

The Realistic Weight concept accepts that you can feel better, look better, and have fewer medical problems while falling far short of the recommended “healthy” body mass index (BMI, discussed later). Many of the illnesses caused or aggravated by overweight are improved significantly by loss of only 5 or 10 percent of body weight. The concept admits the the body cannot always be shaped at will: much of your shape and fat distribution are genetically determined. If all your blood relatives, have big buttocks, thighs, and legs, you will also, although you do have control over degree.

For many people, the Realistic Weight concept is helpful and valid, and prevents the discouragement felt when performance falls short of ideal. Let’s not allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good. It’s not realistic to expect a 40-year-old mother of three to weigh the same as a 17-year-old girl with no kids.

Body Mass Index (BMI) is your weight in kilograms divided by your height in meters squared (kg/m2). To determine your BMI but skip the math, use an online calculator.

From a health standpoint, BMIs between 18.5 and 24.9 are the best for people under 65–75 years old. About a third of the United States population is at this healthy weight. If you are 5-feet, 3-inches tall, your maximum healthy weight is 140 pounds (BMI 24.9). If you are 5-feet, 9-inches tall, your maximum healthy weight is 169 pounds (BMI 24.9).

BMIs between 25 and 29.9 designate “overweight” and accurately describe about 35 percent of the U.S. population. A BMI of 30 or higher defines “obesity” and indicates high risk for poor health. About 30 percent of us are obese. At a BMI of 35 and above, the incidence of death and disease increases sharply.

The BMI concept is helpful to researchers and obesity clinicians, but the number doesn’t mean much yet to the average person on the street, nor to many physicians. It should be used more widely. Know your BMI. If it is under 25, any excess fat you carry is unlikely to affect your health and longevity; your efforts to lose weight would be purely cosmetic.

If we look only at older Americans, over 65–75 years old, being overweight, but not obese, seems to prolong life on average. Longest life spans are seen in these older people with a body mass index between 25 and 30. Disability rates are lowest for older Americans with a BMI around 24. So, if you are over 65, you may have less disability at a body mass index of 24, but you may die slightly earlier that someone with a BMI in the overweight range. These numbers, of course, apply only to groups of people defined by BMI, not to individuals.

So, how much weight should you lose?

As a medical man, I endorse the healthy BMI concept (BMI 18.5 to 24.9) while realizing you may have aesthetic reasons to shoot for the lower end of the range. If you have weight-related health issues, aim for a BMI of 18.5-24.9, with 25 to 30 as your fallback position. If you are over 65, consider a goal BMI between 25 and 30.

It’s important to set a weight goal. If you don’t know where you’re going, you’ll never get there.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Prepare For Weight Loss, Part 5: Supportive Social System

Success at any major endeavor is easier when you have a supportive social system. And make no mistake: losing a significant amount of weight and keeping it off long-term is a major endeavor.

As an example of a supportive social system, consider childhood education. A network of actors play supportive roles. Parents provide transportation, school supplies, a home study area, help with homework, etc. Siblings leave the child alone so he can do his homework, and older ones set an example. Neighbors may participate in carpooling. Taxpayers provide money for public schools. Teachers do their part. The school board oversees the curriculum, supervises teachers, and does long-range planning.

Success is more likely when all the actors work together for their common goal: education of the child. Similarly, your starring role in a weight-loss program may win an Academy Award if you have a strong cast of supporting actors. Your mate, friends, co-workers, and relatives may be helpers or hindrances. It will help if they:

  • give you encouragement instead of criticism
  • don’t tempt you with taboo foods
  • show respect for your commitment and willpower
  • give you time to exercise
  • go an a diet or exercise with you, if they are overweight or need exercise
  • understand why there are no longer certain foods in the house
  • appreciate the nutritious, sensible foods that are now in the house
  • forgive and understand when you occasionally backslide
  • gently remind you of your commitment when needed
  • reward you with compliments as you make progress
  • don’t compare your physique unfavorably with supermodels or surgically-sculpted bodies
  • don’t get jealous when you lose weight and are more attractive and energetic.

Your social support system can make or break your commitment and willpower. Ask them to help you.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Prepare For Weight Loss, Part 4: Starting New Habits

You already have a number of good habits that support your health and make your life more enjoyable, productive, and efficient. For example, you brush your teeth and bathe regularly, put away clean clothes in particular spots, pay bills on time, get up and go to work every day, wear your seat belt, put your keys or purse in one place when you get home, balance your checkbook periodically.

At one point, these habits took much more effort than they do now. But you decided they were the right thing to do, made them a priority, practiced them at first, made a conscious effort to perform them on schedule, and repeated them over time. All this required discipline. That’s how good habits become part of your lifestyle, part of you. Over time, your habits require much less effort and hardly any thought. You just do it.

Your decision to lose fat permanently means that you must establish some new habits, such as regular exercise and reasonable food restriction. You’ve already demonstrated that you have self-discipline. The application of that discipline to new behaviors will support your commitment and willpower.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Prepare For Weight Loss, Part 3: Free Will

The only way to lose excess fat weight is to cut down on the calories you take in, increase your physical activity, or do both.

Oh, sure. You could get a leg amputated, develop hyperthyroidism or out-of-control diabetes, or have liposuction or bariatric surgery. But you get my drift.

Although the exercise portion of the energy balance equation is somewhat optional, you must reduce food intake to lose a significant amount of weight. Once you reach your goal weight you will be able to return to nearly your current calorie consumption, and even higher consumption if you have increased your muscle mass and continue to be active.

Are you be able to reduce calorie intake and increase your physical activity temporarily? It comes down to whether we have free will. Free will is the power, attributed especially to humans, of making free choices that are unconstrained by external circumstances or by an agency such as divine will.

Will is the mental faculty by which one chooses or decides upon a course of action; volition.

Willpower is the strength of will to carry out one’s decisions, wishes, or plans.

If we don’t have free will, you’re wasting time trying to lose weight through dieting; nothing will get your weight problem under control. Even liposuction and weight-reduction stomach surgery will fail in time if you are fated to be fat. The existence of free will is confirmed for me by my education in religion and philosophy, my intuition, and most prominently, by my experience. I have seen hundreds of my patients lose weight and keep it under control. I didn’t do it for them. No other person, pill, or agency did it for them. They didn’t achieve success by being passive victims of external circumstances. They cut back on calories and increased activity levels through strength of will. They did it.

Read about other success stories at The National Weight Control Registry.

You can enhance your willpower and commitment to losing weight by learning about:

Steve Parker, M.D.

Prepare For Weight Loss, Part 2: The Energy Balance Equation

An old joke from my medical school days asks, “How many psychiatrists does it take to change a light bulb?” Only one, but the light bulb must want to change.

How many weight-loss programs does it take before you lose that weight for good? Only one, but…

Where does the fat go when you lose weight dieting? Metabolic reactions convert it to energy, water, and carbon dioxide, which weigh less than fat. Most of your energy supply is used to fuel basic life-maintaining physiologic processes at rest, referred to as resting or basal metabolism. Basal metabolic rate (BMR) is expressed as calories per kilogram of body weight per hour. Even at rest, a kilogram of muscle is much more metabolically active than a kilogram of fat tissue. So muscular lean people sitting quietly in a room are burning more calories than are fat people of the same weight sitting in the same room.

The major determinants of BMR are age, sex, and the body’s relative proportions of muscle and fat. Heredity plays a lesser role.

Energy not used for basal metabolism is either stored as fat or converted by the muscles to physical activity. Most of us use about 70 percent of our energy supply for basal metabolism and 30 percent for physical activity. Those who exercise regularly and vigorously may expend 40–60 percent of their calorie intake doing physical activity. Excess energy not used in resting metabolism or physical activity is stored as fat.

If you want to lose excess weight and keep it off, you must learn the following equation:

The energy you eat,

minus the energy you burn in metabolism and activity,

determines your change in body fat.

Or, more succinctly:

Energy Intake minus Energy Expenditure Equals Change in Energy Stores

This is the Energy Balance Equation.

Energy is measured in calories. For example, if you eat 2,000 calories of energy daily, but burn up 2,300 calories daily, you will have a negative energy balance and your fat stores will go down. That is, you lose weight.

Now, a pound of body fat contains 3,500 calories, so you have a way to go before you lose a pound on the bathroom scale.

Overweight and obesity result from an imbalance between energy intake and expenditure.

It’s just that simple. The degree of this imbalance is quite small. Over the course of a year, you will gain three and a half pounds of fat just by adding a teaspoon of butter to your dinner roll every day, assuming all other variables are unchanged. Simply avoid a 10 minute walk daily for a year and you will gain five and a half pounds. Taking the walk and avoiding the teaspoon of butter sound easy, and they are, but if not done you will gain 35 pounds over the course of five years.

While we don’t have much control over our basal metabolic energy requirements (roughly 1,200–1,500 calories daily), many of us are able to adjust food intake and activity levels to strike a happy balance in the energy equation, minimizing unwanted fat. For a lucky few, that desirable balance is automatic and unconscious. The rest of us have to think about it, work at it, make it a priority at times.

Right now your balance is tipped in favor of excess energy stores (fat). It will soon be tipped in the other direction. You will convert fat to energy and lose weight in the process. Once you achieve your goal weight, the energy equation must be balanced again.

There is no doubt that the energy balance equation applies to you. People who swear they can’t lose weight on extreme low-calorie diets have been locked up (with consent) in university medical center metabolic wards with access to food strictly controlled by staff. On appropriate calorie-restricted diets, everyone loses weight. When an exercise program is added, they lose more weight.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Prepare For Weight Loss, Part 1: Motivation

New Years Day 2013 will be here before you know it. And with it comes New Years Resolutions, often including loss of excess weight. 10 PM December 31, with a couple glasses of champagne on-board, is not the best time to flippantly add “4. Lose weight starting tomorrow” to your resolution list. That’s a set-up for failure.

Success requires careful forethought. Questions beg for answers.

Which of the myriad weight-loss programs will I follow? Can I design my own program? Should I use a diet book? Sign up for Nutri-System, Weight Watchers, or Jenny Craig?

Should I stop wasting my time dieting and go directly to bariatric surgery?

Can I simply cut back on sodas and chips? What should I eat? What should I not eat?

Do I need to start exercising? What kind? How much? Do I need to join a gym? What methods are proven to increase my odds of success?

How much weight should I lose?

Should I use weight-loss pills or supplements? Which ones?

What’s the easiest, most effective way to lose weight? Is there a program that doesn’t require willpower?

Now, what were those “top 10 super-power foods” that melt away the fat? Am I ready to get serious and stick with it this time?

Today I start a eight-part series: Prepare for Weight Loss. The series will answer many of these questions and get you teed up for success. Teed up like a golfer ready to hit his first shot on hole #1 of an 18-hole course. [For non-golfers: a tee is a little wooden stick the golfer places his ball on top of for the first shot of any hole.]

We start with Motivation.

Immediate, short-term motivation to lose weight may stem from an upcoming high school reunion, swimsuit season, or a wedding. You want to look your best. Maybe you want to attract a mate or keep one interested. Perhaps a boyfriend, co-worker, or relative said something mean about your weight. These motivators may work, but only temporarily. Basing a lifestyle change on them is like building on shifting sands. You need a firmer foundation for a lasting structure. Without a lifestyle change, you are unlikely to vanquish a chronic overweight problem. Proper long-term motivation may grow from:

  • the discovery that you feel great and have more energy when you are lighter and eating sensibly
  • the sense of accomplishment from steady progress
  • the acknowledgment that you have free will and are responsible for your weight and many aspects of your health
  • the inspiration from seeing others take charge of their lives successfully
  • the admission that you have some guilt and shame about being fat, and that you like yourself more when you’re not fat [I’m not laying shame or guilt on you; many of us do it to ourselves.]
  • the awareness of overweight-related adverse health effects and their improvement with even modest weight loss.

Appropriate motivation will support the commitment and willpower that will be needed soon.

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS: I’m thinking of how Dave Ramsay, when he’s counseling people who have gotten way overhead in debt, tells them they have to get mad at the debt. Then they can attack it. Maybe you have to get mad at your fat. It’s your enemy, dragging you down, trying to kill you. Now attack it!

Updated December 19, 2009

Fat Cell Turnover: Implications for Weight Loss

The number of fat cells in our bodies is constant throughout adult life for both lean and overweight people. When adults gain fat weight, it’s because our individual fat cells store more fat, thereby enlarging. We don’t gain more fat cells. Conversely, when we lose weight, the fat cells shrink.

Our number of fat cells is set during childhood and adolescence. Lean individuals generally have fewer fat cells than overweight people.

In many living tissues, individual cells gradually die off and are replaced by new cells. For example, we shed dead skin cells all the time, but they are replaced just as quickly by new skin cells. A red blood cell lives three months then dies and is replaced. The percentage of cells that die and are replaced over a period of time is called “turnover.”

Researchers in Stockholm recently studied the turnover of fat cells in humans. They measured turnover by analysing the incorporation of carbon-14 derived from nuclear bomb tests in genomic DNA. They found that 10% of fat cells die off and are renewed yearly at all adult ages in both skinny and overweight people.

So what?

Well, if 10% of your fat cells die every year, what if you could prevent them from being replaced with new ones? You would lose weight, as long as your remaining fat cells didn’t swell with more stored fat. Next year, another 10% of your fat cells die, and so on.

How can we prevent dead fat cells from being replaced by new ones? Nobody knows . . . yet. You can bet that pharmaceutical companies are thinking about this.

But I wouldn’t hold my breath. Pharmaceutical intervention will not be available for at least eight to 10 years, if ever.

We already have available, in 2009, a tried and true method for reducing fat mass: Eat Less, Move More.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference: Spalding, K.L., et al. Dynamics of fat cell turnover in humans. Nature, 453 (2008): 783-787. Epub May 4, 2008. PMID: 18454136.

“Doc, I Hardly Eat Anything And I Still Can’t Lose Weight!”

Every now and then an overweight patient tells me he can’t lose weight even though his typical daily food intake is two pieces of plain toast, a cup of grapes, a hard-boiled egg, and three celery stalks. That’s 530 calories. Most adults eat between 1200 to 3000 calories a day.

Even if he lays around on a couch all day watching TV with a remote control channel changer, I know my patient’s basal metabolism requires at least 1,000 calories daily to keep him alive. He says he’s eating only 530. His body must have, and will get, the extra 470 calories from his fat stores. Over time, he must lose weight as his body converts his fat into basal metabolic energy to keep him alive.

Yet he swears he’s not losing weight, and, in fact, may be gaining. I don’t believe he’s lying to me. What’s going on here?

The answer is suggested by a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Ten similar “diet resistant” obese people – nine women, one man, average weight 189 pounds (86 kg) – were carefully studied by a team of researchers. They were taught to record all food intake over time in a diary. When the foods eaten were totaled up, average self-reported intake was 1,000 calories daily.

A highly accurate method of measuring calorie expenditure, called “doubly labeled water,” proved that average calorie intake was actually 2,000 calories daily. Furthermore, they over-reported their physical activity by 50 percent. The authors of the study note that while many people under-report their caloric intake, the degree of under-reporting is greater in obese people. They admit that “the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon are not well understood.”

Their conclusion:

People who just can’t lose weight despite “severe calorie restriction” are in fact eating more calories than they think.

How can we overcome this tendency? One solution is to keep a food journal.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference: Lichtman, Steven, et al. Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. New England Journal of Medicine, 327 (1992): 1,893-1,898.

Spanish Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet

Ever heard of the Spanish Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet? It looks like a low-carb quasi-Mediterranean diet.

Researchers with the University of Cordoba in Spain studied 40 subjects eating a low-carb “Mediterranean” diet for 12 weeks. The results were strikingly positive.

Methodology

A medical weight loss clinic was the source of 40 overweight subjects, 22 males and 19 females, average age 38, average body mass index 36.5, average weight 108.6 kg (239 lb). These folks were interested in losing weight, and were not paid to participate.

Nine subjects were not included in the final analysis due to poor compliance with the study protocol (3), the diet was too expensive (1), a traumatic car wreck (1), or were simply lost to follow-up (4). So all the data are pooled from the 31 subjects who completed the study.

Blood from all subjects was drawn just before the study began and again after 12 weeks of the diet.

Study diet: Low-carbohydrate, high in protein [and probably fat, too], unlimited in calories. Olive oil was the main source of fat (at least 30 ml daily). Maximum of 30 grams of carbohydrates daily as green vegetables and salad. 200-400 ml daily of red wine. The authors write:

Participants were permitted 3 portions (200 g/portion) of vegetables daily: 2 portions of salad vegetables (such as alfalfa sprouts, lettuce, escarole, endive, mushrooms, radicchio, radishes, parsley, peppers, chicory, spinach, cucumber, chard and celery), and 1 portion of low-carbohydrate vegetables (such as broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage, artichoke, eggplant, squash, tomato and onion). 3 portions of salad vegetables were allowed only if the portion of low-carbohydrate vegetables were not consumed. Salad dressing allowed were: garlic, olive oil, vinegar, lemon juice, salt, herbs and spices.

The minimum 30 ml of olive oil were distributed unless in 10 ml per principal meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner). Red wine (200–400 ml a day) was distributed in 100–200 ml per lunch and dinner. The protein block was divided in “fish block” and “no fish block”. The “fish block” included all the types of fish except larger, longer-living predators (swordfish and shark). The “no fish block” included meat, fowl, eggs, shellfish and cheese. Both protein blocks were not mixed in the same day and were consumed individually during its day on the condition that at least 4 days of the week were for the “fish block”.

Trans fats (margarines and their derivatives) and processed meats with added sugar were not allowed.

Vitamin and mineral supplements were given.

Subjects measured their ketosis state every morning with urine ketone strips.

Results (averaged)

  • Body weight fell from 108.6 kg (239 lb) to 94.5 kg (209 lb), or 2.5 pounds per week
  • Body mass index fell from 36.5 to 31.8
  • Systolic blood pressure fell from126 to 109 mmHg
  • Diastolic blood pressure fell from 85 to 75 mmHg
  • Total cholesterol fell from 208 to 187 mg/dl
  • LDL chol fell from 115 to 106 mg/dl
  • HDL chol rose from 50 to 55 mg/dl
  • Fasting glucose dropped from 110 to 93 mg/dl
  • Triglycerides fell from 219 to 114 mg/dl
  • No significant differences in male and female subjects
  • No adverse reactions are mentioned

Researchers’ Conclusions

The SKMD [Spanish Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet] is safe, an effective way of losing weight, promoting non-atherogenic lipid profiles, lowering blood pressure and improving fasting blood glucose levels. Future research should include a larger sample size, a longer term use and a comparison with other ketogenic diets.

My Comments

The researchers called this diet “Mediterranean” based on olive oil, red wine, fish, and vegetables.

What’s “Not Mediterranean” is the paucity of carbohydrates (including whole grains); lack of yogurt, nuts, and legumes; and the high meat/protein intake.

The emphasis on olive oil, red wine, and fish could make this healthier than other ketogenic diets.

Ketogenic diets are notorious for high drop-out rates compared to other diets. But several studies suggest greater short-term weight loss for people who stick with it. Efficacy and superiority are little different from other diets as measured at one year out.

Many of the metabolic improvements seen here might be duplicated with loss of 30 pounds (13.6 kg) over 12 weeks using any reasonable diet.

Average fasting blood sugars in these subjects was 109 mg/dl. Although not mentioned by the authors, this is in the prediabetes range. The diet reduced average fasting blood sugar to 93, which would mean resolution of prediabetes. Dropping body mass index from 36 to 32 by any method would tend to cure prediabetes.

Elevated blood sugar is one component of the “metabolic syndrome.” Metabolic syndrome was recently shown to be reversible with a Mediterranean diet supplemented with nuts.

If you’re thinking about doing something like this, get more information and be sure to get your doctor’s approval first.

My Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet has much in common with the study at hand. One of several major differences is that it’s user-friendly and ready to implement as soon as you have your physician’s clearance. It’s posted at the Diabetic Mediterranean Diet Blog.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Addendum:

In April, 2008, had a delightful conversation with Jimmy Moore, of Livin’ La Vida Low-Carb fame regarding this study. I reviewed this article in preparation.  It struck me that the Spanish Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet is probably higher in protein and lower in fat than many other ketogenic weight-loss diets. Since fish is emphasized over other animal-derived foods, it’s likely also lower in saturated fat. (In low-carb diets, carbohydrates are substituted with either fats or proteins.)

References and Additional Reading:

Perez-Guisado, J., Munoz-Serrano, A., and Alonso-Moraga, A. Spanish Ketogenic Mediterranean diet: a healthy cardiovascular diet for weight loss. Nutrition Journal, 2008, 7:30. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-7-30 I like the idea behind Nutrition Journal. From the publisher’s website:

Nutrition Journal aims to encourage scientists and physicians of all fields to publish results that challenge current models, tenets or dogmas. The journal invites scientists and physicians to submit work that illustrates how commonly used methods and techniques are unsuitable for studying a particular phenomenon. Nutrition Journal strongly promotes and invites the publication of clinical trials that fall short of demonstrating an improvement over current treatments. The aim of the journal is to provide scientists and physicians with responsible and balanced information in order to improve experimental designs and clinical decisions.

With the advent of the Internet, has dawned a new way to exchange information and to publish biomedical journals. BioMed Central has been a pioneer in online publishing with Nutrition Journal being one of its many journals. Publication in Nutrition Journal offers many advantages over traditional paper publications; the journal offers free access to its articles; high quality and rapid peer-review; immediate publication; and most importantly, universal access to its content from virtually any place in the world.

Bravata, D.M., et al. Efficacy and safety of low-carbohydrate diets: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289 (2003): 1,837-1,850.

Gardner, C.D., et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women: the A TO Z Weight Loss Study: a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 297 (2007): 696-677.

Stern, L., et al. The effects of low-carbohydrate versus conventional weight loss diets in severely obese adults: one-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 140 (2004): 778-785.

Shai, Iris, et al. Weight Loss with a Low-Carbohydrate, Mediterranean, or Low-Fat Diet. New England Journal of Medicine, 359 (2008): 229-241.

Yo-Yo Dieting In Women Has No Effect On Death Rates

Yo-yo dieting isn’t so bad after all.

Fifteen years ago there was lots of hand-wringing in the medical community about the potential dire physical consequences of “weight cycling” – also known as yo-yo dieting. You know, lose a bunch of weight, gain it back, lose it again, gain it back, etc.

After a while, yo-yo dieting as a medical issue dropped off the radar screen. 

A 2009 study in the Archives of Internal Medicine reported on the cardiovascular and mortality effects of yo-yo dieting in women in the massive Nurses’ Health Study. One in four of these women could be classified as weight cyclers. The worst ones were defined as those who lost at least 9.1 kg ( 20 pounds) at least three times.

It turns out the weight cyclers had the same rates of death from cardiovascular disease or any cause as the women who didn’t cycle. They did eventually gain more overall weight as they aged, compared to the non-cyclers.

Note that this study investigated death rates only. So there may have been effects on rates of high blood pressure, diabetes, gout, stroke, etc, that we wouldn’t know about.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Field, Alison, et al. Weight cycling and mortality among middle-aged or older women. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169 (2009): 881-886.