Category Archives: Coronary Heart Disease

Heart Patients, Listen Up: Mediterranean Diet to the Rescue

The Mediterranean diet preserves heart muscle performance and reduces future heart disease events, according to Greek researchers reporting in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, May 19, 2010.

Reuters and other news services have covered the story.

The Mediterranean diet is well-established as an eating pattern that reduces the risk of death or illness related to cardiovascular disease—mostly heart attacks and strokes. Most of the studies in support of the heart-healthy diet looked at development of disease in general populations. The study at hand examined whether the diet had any effect on patients with known heart disease, which has not been studied much.

How Was the Study Done?

The study population was 1,000 consecutive patients admitted with heart disease to a Greek hospital between 2006 and 2009. In this context, heart disease refers to a first or recurrent heart attack (70-80% of participants) or unstable angina pectoris. Acute heart attacks and unstable angina are “acute coronary syndromes.” Average age was 64. Sixty percent had a prior diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease or stroke). Thirty percent had diabetes. At the time of hospitalization, half had diminished function of the main heart pumping chamber (the left ventricle), half had normal pump function. Men totalled 788; women 212.

On the third hospital day, participants were given a 75-item food frequency questionnaire asking about consumption over the prior year. If a potential enrollee died in the first two hospital days, he was not included in the study. A Mediterranean diet score was calculated to determine adherence to the Mediterranean diet. Mediterranean diet items were nonrefined cereals and products, fruits, nuts, vegetables, potatoes, dairy products, fish and seafood, poultry, red meats and meat products, olive oil, and alcohol.

Left ventricle function was determined by echocardiogram (ultrasound) at the time of study entry, at the time of hospital discharge, and three months after discharge. Systolic dysfunction was defined as an ejection fraction of under 40%. [Normal is 65%: when the left ventricle is full of blood, and then squeezes on that blood to pump it into the aorta, 65% of the blood squirts out.]

Participants were then divided into two groups: preserved (normal) systolic left ventricular function, or diminished left ventricular function.

They were followed over the next two years, with attention to cardiovascular disease events (not clearly defined in the article, but I assume including heart attacks, strokes, unstable angina, coronary revascularization, heart failure, arrhythmia, and death from heart disease or stroke.

Results

  • Four percent of participants died during the initial hospitalization.
  • At the three month follow-up visit, those with greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet (a high Mediterranean diet score) had higher left ventricular performance (P=0.02).
  • At the time of hospital admission, higher ejection fractions were associated with greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet (P<0.001).
  • Those who developed diminished left ventricular dysfunction had a lower Mediterranean diet score (P<0.001)
  • During the hospital stay, those in the highest third of Mediterranean diet score had lower in-hospital deaths (compared with the lower third scores) (P=0.009).
  • Among those who survived the initial hospitalization, there was no differences in fatal cardiovascular outcomes based on Mediterranean diet score.
  • Food-specific analysis tended to favor better cardiovascular health (at two-year follow-up) for those with higher “vegetable and salad” and nut consumption. No significant effect was found for other components of the Mediterranean diet score.
  • Of those in the highest third of Mediterranean adherence, 75% had avoided additional fatal and nonfatal cardiovasclar disease events as measured at two years. Of those in the lowest third of Mediterranean diet score, only 53% avoided additional cardiovascular disease events.

The Authors’ Conclusion

Greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet seems to preserve left ventricular systolic function and is associated with better long-term prognosis of patients who have had an acute coronary syndrome.

My Comments

I agree with the authors’ conclusion.

We’re assuming these patients didn’t change their way of eating after the initial hospitalization. We don’t know that. No information is given regarding dietary instruction of these patients while they were hospitalized. In the U.S., such instruction is usually given, and it varies quite a bit.

In this study, lower risk of cardiovascular death was linked to the Mediterranean diet only during the initial hospital stay. Most experts on the Mediterranean diet would have predicted lower cardiovascular death rates over the subsequent two years. Mysteriously, the authors don’t bother to discuss this finding.

For those who don’t enjoy red wine or other alcoholic beverages, this study suggests that the Mediterranean diet may be just as heart-healthy without alcohol. A 2009 study by Trichopoulou et al suggests otherwise.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference:

Chrysohoou, C., Panagiotakos, D., Aggelopoulos, P., Kastorini, C., Kehagia, I., Pitsavos, C., & Stefanadis, C. (2010). The Mediterranean diet contributes to the preservation of left ventricular systolic function and to the long-term favorable prognosis of patients who have had an acute coronary event American Journal of Clinical Nutrition DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28982

Documented Health Benefits of the Mediterranean Diet

The enduring popularity of the Mediterranean diet is attributable to three things:

1.Taste

2.Variety

3.Health benefits

For our purposes today, I use “diet” to refer to the usual food and drink of a person, not a weight-loss program.

 

The scientist most responsible for the popularity of the diet, Ancel Keys, thought the heart-healthy aspects of the diet related to low saturated fat consumption.He also thought the lower blood cholesterol levels in Mediterranean populations (at least Italy and Greece) had something to do with it, too.Dietary saturated fat does tend to raise cholesterol levels.

 

Even if Keys was wrong about saturated fat and cholesterol levels being positively associated with heart disease, numerous studies (involving eight countries on three continents) strongly suggest that the Mediterranean diet is one of the healthiest around.See References below for the most recent studies.

 

Relatively strong evidence supports the Mediterranean diet’s association with:

increased lifespan

lower rates of cardiovascular disease such as heart attacks and strokes

lower rates of cancer (prostate, breast, uterus, colon)

lower rates of dementia

lower incidence of type 2 diabetes

 

 

Weaker supporting evidence links the Mediterranean diet with:

slowed progression of dementia

prevention of cutaneous melanoma

lower severity of type 2 diabetes, as judged by diabetic drug usage and fasting blood sugars

less risk of developing obesity

better blood pressure control in the elderly

improved weight loss and weight control in type 2 diabetics

improved control of asthma

reduced risk of developing diabetes after a heart attack

reduced risk of mild cognitive impairment

prolonged life of Alzheimer disease patients

lower rates and severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

lower risk of gastric (stomach) cancer

less risk of macular degeneration

less Parkinsons disease

increased chance of pregnancy in women undergoing fertility treatment

reduced prevalence of metabolic syndrome (when supplemented with nuts)

lower incidence of asthma and allergy-like symptoms in children of women who followed the Mediterranean diet while pregnant

Did you notice that I used the word “association” in relating the Mediterranean diet to health outcomes?Association, of course, is not causation.

 

The way to prove that a particular diet is healthier is to take 20,000 similar young adults, randomize the individualsin an interventional study to eat one of two test diets for the next 60 years, monitoring them for the development of various diseases and death.Make sure they stay on the assigned test diet.Then you’d have an answer for that population and those two diets.Then you have to compare the winning diet to yet other diets.And a study done in Caucasians would not necessarily apply to Asians, Native Americans, Blacks, or Hispanics.

 

Now you begin to see why scientists tend to rely on observationalrather than interventional diet studies.

 

I became quite interested in nutrition around the turn of the century as my patients asked me for dietary advice to help them lose weight and control or prevent various diseases.At that time, the Atkins diet, Mediterranean diet, and Dr. Dean Ornish’s vegetarian program for heart patients were all prevalent.And you couldn’t pick three programs with more differences!So I had my work cut out for me.

 

After much scientific literature review, I find the Mediterranean diet to be the healthiest for the general population.People with particular medical problems or ethnicities may do better on another diet. People with diabetes or prediabetes are probably better off with a carbohydrate-restricted diet, such as the Low-Carb Mediterranean Diet.

 

Dan Buettner makes a good argument for plant-based diets in his longevity book, The Blue Zones.The Mediterranean diet qualifies as plant-based.

 

Steve Parker, M.D.

 

     Sofi, Francesco, et al. Accruing evidence about benefits of adherence to the Mediterranean diet on health: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, ePub ahead of print, September 1, 2010. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29673

     Buckland, Genevieve, et al. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and risk of gastric adenocarcinoma within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 9, 2009, epub ahead of print. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28209

     Fortes, C., et al. A protective effect of the Mediterraenan diet for cutaneous melanoma. International Journal of Epidmiology, 37 (2008): 1,018-1,029.

Sofi, Francesco, et al. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and health status: Meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 337; a1344. Published online September 11, 2008. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1344

     Benetou, V., et al. Conformity to traditional Mediterranean diet and cancer incidence: the Greek EPIC cohort. British Journal of Cancer, 99 (2008): 191-195.

Mitrou, Panagiota N., et al. Mediterranean Dietary Pattern and Prediction of All-Cause Mortality in a US Population, Archives of Internal Medicine, 167 (2007): 2461-2468.

     Feart, Catherine, et al. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet, cognitive decline, and risk of dementia. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302 (2009): 638-648.

Scarmeas, Nikolaos, et al. Physical activity, diet, and risk of Alzheimer Disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302 (2009): 627-637.

     Scarmeas, Nikolaos, et al. Mediterranean Diet and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Archives of Neurology, 66 (2009): 216-225.

Scarmeas, N., et al. Mediterranean diet and Alzheimer disease mortality. Neurology, 69 (2007):1,084-1,093.

     Fung, Teresa, et al. Mediterranean diet and incidence of and mortality from coronary heart disease and stroke in women. Circulation, 119 (2009): 1,093-1,100.

Mente, Andrew, et al. A Systematic Review of the Evidence Supporting a Causal Link Between Dietary Factors and Coronary Heart Disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169 (2009): 659-669.

     Salas-Salvado, Jordi, et al. Effect of a Mediterranean Diet Supplemented With Nuts on Metabolic Syndrome Status: One-Year Results of the PREDIMED Randomized Trial. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168 (2008): 2,449-2,458.

     Mozaffarian, Dariush, et al. Incidence of new-onset diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in patients with recent myocardial infarction and the effect of clinical and lifestyle risk factors. Lancet, 370 (2007) 667-675.

     Esposito, Katherine, et al. Effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on the need for antihyperglycemic drug therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151 (2009): 306-314.

     Shai, Iris, et al. Weight Loss with a Low-Carbohydrate, Mediterranean, or Low-Fat Diet. New England Journal of Medicine, 359 (2008): 229-241.

     Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A., et al. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and risk of developing diabetes: prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, BMJ,doi:10.1136/bmj.39561.501007.BE (published online May 29, 2008).

     Trichopoulou, Antonia, et al. Anatomy of health effects of the Mediterranean diet: Greek EPIC prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 338 (2009): b2337. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2337.

     Barros, R., et al. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and fresh fruit intake are associated with improved asthma control. Allergy, vol. 63 (2008): 917-923.

     Varraso, Raphaelle, et al. Prospective study of dietary patterns and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among US men. Thorax, vol. 62, (2007): 786-791.

High-Carbohydrate Eating Promotes Heart Disease in Women

Women double their risk of developing coronary heart disease if they have high consumption of carbohydrates, according to research published in the Archives of Internal Medicine.

Men’s hearts, however, didn’t seem to be affected by carb consumption. I mention this crucial sex difference because many experts believe that replacing saturated fat with carbohydrates is a major cause of heart disease. If true, it seems to apply only to women.

(Another nutrition science trend to keep an eye on is the thought that excessive consumption of omega-6 fats contributes to hardening of the arteries, including coronary heart disease. I’m talking about soy oil, safflower oil, corn oil, among others. No doubt, we’re eating a lot more omega-6 now than at the start of the 20th century.)

We’ve known for a while that high-glycemic-index eating was linked to heart disease in women but not men. Glycemic index is a measure of how much effect a carbohydrate-containing food has on blood glucose levels. High-glycemic-index foods raise blood sugar higher and for longer duration in the bloodstream.

High-glycemic-index foods include potatoes and white bread, for example.

The study at hand included over 47,000 Italians who were interrogated via questionnaire as to their food intake, then onset of coronary heart disease—the cause of heart attacks—was measured over the next eight years.

Among the 32,500 women, 158 new cases of coronary heart disease were found.

Researchers doing this sort of study typically compare the people eating the least carbs with those eating the most. The highest quartile of carb consumers and glycemic load had twice the rate of heart disease compared to the lowest quartile.

The Cleave-Yudkin theory of the mid-20th century proposed that excessive amounts of refined carbohydrates cause heart disease and certain other chronic systemic diseases. Gary Taubes has also written extensively about this. The research results at hand support that theory in women, but not in men.

Practical Applications

Do these research results apply to non-Italian women and men? Probably to some, but not all. More research is needed.

Women with a family history coronary heart disease—or other CHD risk factors—might be well-advised to put a limit on total carbs, high-glycemic-index foods, and glycemic load. I’d stay out of that “highest quartile.” Don’t forget: heart disease is the No. 1 killer of women.

See NutritionData’s Glycemic Index page for information you can apply today.

FYI, the Low-Carb Mediterranean Diet and Ketogenic Mediterranean Diet are also low in glycemic index.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Disclaimer: All matters regarding your health require supervision by a personal physician or other appropriate health professional familiar with your current health status. Always consult your personal physician before making any dietary or exercise changes.

Addendum: Alert reader Nadia Hassan brought to my attention that I had originally written that pasta has a high glycemic index. Citing appropriate references, Nadia convinced me that pasta has a low-to-moderate glycemic index, from around 30 to 60. Its GI also is higher if over-cooked. I corrected my original post.

References:

Sieri, Sabina, et al. Dietary glycemic load and index and risk of coronary heart disease in a large Italian cohort. The EPICOR study. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170 (2010): 640-647.

Barclay, Alan, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk – a meta-analysis of observational studies [of mostly women]. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 87 (2008): 627-637.

DASH Diet Reduces Risk of Heart Disease and Stroke in Women

U.S News and World Report recently ranked the DASH diet as the No.1 Healthiest Diet.  Today I partly explain why.

The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet has been shown to lower blood pressure.  Another study associated a DASH-style diet with lower incidence of heart attack and stroke.

The DASH diet is low in total and saturated fats and cholesterol, moderate in low-fat dairy products, high in fruits and vegetables, low in salt, low in sweetened beverages, moderate in whole grains, and low in animal protein but has substantial amounts of plant protein from nuts and legumes.

The DASH diet was designed as a healthy way of eating, not a weight-loss diet.  It is promoted by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute for the prevention and treatment of high blood pressure.  It is also included as an example of a healthy diet in the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.  Yet many people still have never heard of it.

Researchers affiliated with multiple Boston and Atlanta institutions looked at the participants in the massive Nurses Health Study.  88,517 middle-aged women free of stroke, diabetes, and coronary heart disease were followed between 1980 to 2004.  They filled out food frequency questionnaires designed to assess average food intake over the preceding year.  The researchers constructed a DASH diet score and graded all the study participants in terms of adherence or conformity to the ideal DASH diet.

Over the course of the study, there were 2129 cases of nonfatal heart attack, 976 deaths from coronary heart disease, and 2317 strokes.  (If you read the original study, please note that some numerical errors were corrected in a later journal issue.)

Women with the highest adherence to the DASH Diet had 24% lower risk for coronary heart disease, compared with the women who had the lowest conformity.  Again comparing the same two groups for stroke, the high-adherence women had 18% less incidence of stroke.  There were clear trends for less coronary heart disease and stroke as adherence to the DASH diet increased.

Blood samples were analyzed for a subset of participants.  Higher DASH compliance was significantly associated with lower plasma levels of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein.  These are markers for the inflammation felt to underlie atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease.  You want to avoid high inflammatory markers.  The DASH diet scores in this study were not associated with serum lipid changes, although other DASH studies found lower LDL cholesterol and an undesirable reduction in HDL cholesterol.

The researchers examined causes of death in participants, yet did not report any association – positive, negative, or neutral – with DASH score.  I wonder why?  It’s possible that higher DASH scores were associated with higher overall death rates even though they had fewer heart attacks and strokes.  I imagine they also had access to cancer death statistics.  Why no mention?  Academicians are under pressure to publish research reports.  Are they saving the mortality and cancer data for future articles?  Abscence of all-cause mortality numbers is a major weakness of this study.

The DASH diet is similar in composition to the traditional Mediterranean diet.  The main differences are that the Mediterranean diet ignores salt intake, allows wine and other alcohol, and places more emphasis on olive oil and whole grains.  The Mediterranean diet has numerous supportive studies showing prolonged lifespan and less chronic disease: fewer heart attacks and strokes, less cancer, less dementia.  And very recently the Mediterranean diet was associated with a lower incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Steve Parker, M.D.

References:

Fung, Teresa, et al.  Adherence to a DASH-Style Diet and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke in Women.  Archives of Internal Medicine, 168 (2008): 713-720.

Your Guide to Lowering Your Blood Pressure with DASH, from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Alcohol Consumption Linked to Lower Rates of Death and Heart Attack

Canadian and U.S. researchers report that moderate alcohol consumption seems to reduce 1) the incidence of coronary heart disease, 2) deaths from coronary heart disease, and 3) deaths from all causes. Reduction of death from all causes is a good counter-argument to those who say alcohol is too dangerous because of deaths from drunk driving, alcoholic cirrhosis, and alcohol-related cancers such as many in the esophagus.

Remember, we’re talking here about low to moderate consumption: one drink a day or less for women, two drinks or less a day for men. That’s a max of 12.5 alcohol for women, 25 g for men. No doubt, alcohol can be extremely dangerous, even lethal. I deal with that in my patients almost every day. Some people should never drink alcohol.

The recent meta-analysis in the British Medical Journal, which the authors say is the most comprehensive ever done, reviewed all pertinent studies done between 1950 and 2009, finally including 84 of the best studies on this issue. Thirty-one of these looked at deaths from all causes.

Compared with non-drinkers, drinkers had a 25% lower risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD) and death from CHD. CHD is the leading cause of death in develop societies.

Stroke is also considered a cardiovascular disease. Overall, alcohol is not linked to stroke incidence or death from stroke. The researchers did see strong trends toward fewer ischemic strokes and more hemorrhagic strokes (bleeding in the brain) in the drinkers. So the net effect was zero.

Compared with non-drinkers, the lowest risk of death from any cause was seen in those consuming 2.5 to 14.9 g per day (one drink or less per day), whose risk was 17% lower. On the other hand, heavy drinkers (>60 g/day) had 30% higher risk of death.

In case you’re wondering, the authors didn’t try to compare the effects of beer versus wine versus distilled spirits.

On a related note, scientists at the Medical University of South Carolina found that middle-aged people who took up the alcohol habit had a lower risk of stroke and heart attack. Wine seemed to be more effective than other alcohol types. They found no differences in overall death rates between new drinkers persistent non-drinkers, perhaps because the study lasted only four years and they were following only 442 new drinkers.

This doesn’t prove that judicious alcohol consumption prevents heart attacks, cardiac deaths, and overall deaths. But it’s kinda lookin’ that way.

Steve Parker, M.D.

Reference: Ronksley PE, Brien SE, Turner BJ, Mukamal KJ, & Ghali WA (2011). Association of alcohol consumption with selected cardiovascular disease outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342 PMID: 21343207

Why Is the Mediterranean Diet So Healthy?

I’ve found that nearly everbody’s eyes glaze over if I try to explain how, physiologically, the Mediterranean diet promotes health and longevity. Below are some of the boring details, for posterity’s sake, from my 2007 book, The Advanced Mediterranean Diet: Lose Weight, Feel Better, Live Longer.

Many of the nutrient-disease associations I mention below are just that: associations, linkages, not hard proof of a benefit. Available studies are often contradictory. For instance, there may be 10 observational studies linking whole grain consumption with reduced deaths from heart disease, while three other studies find no association, or even suggest higher death rates. (I’m making these numbers up.) If you want hard proof, you’ll have to wait. A long time. Such is nutrition science. Take it all with a grain of salt.

Also note that the studies supporting my claims below are nearly all done in non-diabetic populations.

Coronary Heart Disease

Coronary heart disease, also known as coronary artery disease, is the No.1 cause of death in the world. It’s responsible for 40% of deaths in the United States and other industrialized Western countries. The Mediterranean diet is particularly suited to mitigating the ravages of coronary heart disease. Mediterranean diet cardiac benefits may be related to its high content of monounsaturated fat (in olive oil), folate, and antioxidants.

The predominant source of fat in the traditional Mediterranean diet is olive oil, which is rich in monounsaturated fatty acids. High intake of olive oil reduces blood levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL (“bad”) cholesterol. HDL or “good” cho-lesterol is unaffected. Olive oil tends to lower blood pressure in hypertensive people. Monounsaturated fatty acids reduce cardiovascular risk substantially, particularly when they replace simple sugars and easily digestible starches. Monounsaturated fatty acids and olive oil may also reduce breast cancer risk. The cardioprotective (good for the heart) and cancer-reducing effects of olive oil may be partially explained by the oil’s polyphenolic compounds.

Nuts are another good source of monounsaturated fatty acids and polyunsaturated fatty acids, including some omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Nuts have been proven to be cardioprotective. They lower LDL and total cholesterol levels, while providing substantial fiber and numerous micronutrients, such as vitamin E, potassium, magnesium, and folic acid. Compared with those who never or rarely eat nuts, people who eat nuts five or more times per week have 30 to 50% less risk of a fatal heart attack. Lesser amounts of nuts are also cardioprotective, perhaps by reducing lethal heart rhythm dis-turbances.

Another key component of the Mediterranean diet is fish. Fish are excellent sources of protein and are low in cholesterol. Fatty, cold-water fish are particularly good for us because of their omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexanaenoic acid (DHA). The other important omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid is alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), available in certain plants. Our bodies can convert ALA into EPA and DHA, but not very efficiently. Fish oil supplements, which are rich in EPA, lead to lower total cholesterol and triglyce-ride levels. Fish oil supplements have several properties that fight atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries). In people who have already had a heart attack, the omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids have proven to dramatically reduce cardiac deaths, especially sudden death, and nonfatal heart attacks. So omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are “cardioprotective.”

The first sign of underlying coronary heart disease in many people is simply sudden death from a heart attack (myocardial infarction) or heart rhythm disturbance. These unfortunate souls had hearts that were ticking time bombs. I have little doubt that a significant number of such deaths can be prevented by adequate intake of cold-water fatty fish. As a substitute for fish, fish oil supplements might be just at beneficial. The American Heart Association also recommends fish twice weekly for the general population, or fish oil supplements if whole fish isn’t feasible. Compared with fish oil capsules, whole fish are loaded with vitamins, minerals, and protein. The richest fish sources of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are albacore (white) tuna, salmon, sar-dines, trout, sea bass, sword-fish, herring, mackerel, anchovy, halibut, and pompano.

Cardioprotective omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (mainly ALA) are also provided by plants, such as nuts and seeds, legumes, and vegetables. Rich sources of ALA include walnuts, butternuts, soy-beans, flaxseed, almonds, leeks, purslane, pinto beans, and wheat germ. Purslane is also one of the few plant sources of EPA. Several oils are also very high in ALA: flaxseed, canola, and soybean. Look for them in salad dressings, or try cooking with them.

Macular Degeneration

Omega-3 fatty acid and fish consumption may also be “eye-protective.” Eating fish one to three times per week apparently helps prevent age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of blindness in people over 50 in the United States. While AMD has a significant hereditary component, onset and progression of AMD are affected by diet and lifestyle choices. For instance, smoking cigarettes definitely increases your risk of developing AMD. Other foods associated with lower risk of AMD are dark green leafy vegetables, orange and yellow vegetables and fruits: spinach, kale, collard greens, yellow corn, broccoli, sweet potatoes, squash, orange bell peppers, oranges, mangoes, apricots, peaches, honeydew melon, and papaya. Two unifying phytochemicals in this food list are lutein and zeaxanthin, which are also found in red grapes, kiwi fruit, lima beans, green beans, and green bell peppers. Increasing your intake of these foods as part of the Advanced Mediterranean Diet may well help preserve your vision as you age.

Alzheimer’s Dementia

Another exciting potential benefit of fish consumption is prevention or delay of Alzheimer’s dementia. Several recent epidemiologic studies have suggested that intake of fish once or twice per week significantly reduces the risk of Alzheimer’s. Types of fish eaten were not specified. No one knows if fish oil capsules are equivalent. For now, I’m sticking with fatty cold-water fish, which I call my “brain food.”

Vitamin E supplements may slow the progression of established Alzheimer’s disease; clinical studies show either modest slowing of progression or no benefit. As a way to prevent Alzheimer’s, however, vitamin E supplements have been disappointing. On the other hand, high dietary vitamin E is associated with reduced risk of developing Alzheimer’s. Good sources of vitamin E include vegetable oils (especially sunflower and soybean), sunflower seeds, nuts, shrimp, fruits, and certain vegetables: sweet potatoes, asparagus, beans, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, carrots, okra, green peas, sweet peppers, spinach, and tomatoes. All of these are on your new diet.

Wine

For centuries, the healthier populations in the Mediterranean region have enjoyed wine in light to moderate amounts, usually with meals. Epidemiologic studies there and in other parts of the world have associated reasonable alcohol consumption with prolonged lifespan, reduced coronary artery disease, diminished Alzheimer’s and other dementias, and possibly fewer strokes. Alcohol tends to increase HDL cholesterol, have an antiplatelet effect, and may reduce C-reactive protein, a marker of arterial inflammation. These effects would tend to reduce cardiovascular disease. Wine taken with meals provides antioxidant phytochemicals (polyphenols, procyanidins) which may protect against atherosclerosis and some cancers.

What’s a “reasonable” amount of alcohol? An old medical school joke is that a “heavy drinker” is anyone who drinks more than the doctor does. Light to moderate alcohol consumption is generally consi-dered to be one or fewer drinks per day for a woman, two or fewer drinks per day for a man. One drink is 5 ounces of wine, 12 ounces of beer, or 1.5 ounces of 80 proof distilled spirits (e.g., vodka, whiskey, gin). The optimal health-promoting type of alcohol is unclear. I tend to favor wine, a time-honored component of the Mediterranean diet. Red wine in particular is a rich source of resveratrol, which is thought to be a major contributor to the cardioprotective benefits associated with light to moderate alcohol consumption. Grape juice may be just as good—it’s too soon to tell.

I have no intention of overselling the benefits of alcohol. If you are considering habitual alcohol as a food, be aware that the health benefits are still somewhat debatable. Consumption of three or more alcoholic drinks per day is clearly associated with a higher risk of breast cancer in women. Even one or two drinks daily may slightly increase the risk. Folic acid supplementation might mitigate the risk. If you are a woman and breast cancer runs in your family, strongly consider abstinence. Be cautious if there are alcoholics in your family; you may have inherited the predisposition. If you take any medications or have chronic medical conditions, check with your personal physician first. For those drinking above light to mod-erate levels, alcohol is clearly perilous. Higher dosages can cause hypertension, liver disease, heart failure, certain cancers, and other medical problems. And psychosocial problems. And legal problems. And death. Heavy drinkers have higher rates of violent and accidental death. Alcoholism is often fatal. You should not drink alcohol if you:

■ have a history of alcohol abuseor alcoholism
■ have liver or pancreas disease
■ are pregnant or trying to become pregnant
■ may have the need to operatedangerous equipment or machinery, such as an automobile, while under the influence of alcohol
■ have a demonstrated inability tolimit yourself to acceptable intake levels
■ have personal prohibitions due to religious, ethical, or other reasons.

Cancer

Do you ever worry about cancer? You should. It’s the second leading cause of death. Over 500,000 people die from cancer each year in the United States. One third of people in the United States will develop cancer. Twenty percent of us will die from cancer. About half the deaths are from cancer of the lung, breast, and colon/rectum. Are you worried yet?

According to the American Cancer Society, one third of all cancer deaths can be attributed to diet and inadequate physical activity. So we have some control over our risk of developing cancer. High consumption of fruits and vegetables seems to protect against cancer of the lung, stomach, colon, rectum, oral cavity, and esophagus, although other studies dispute the protective linkage. Data on other cancers is limited or inconsistent. If you typically eat little or no fruits and vegetables, you can start today to cut your cancer risk by up to one half. Five servings of fresh fruits and vegetables a day seems to be the protective dose against cancer. Make it a life-long habit. The benefits accrue over time. Fruits and vegetables contain numerous phytochemicals thought to improve or maintain health, such as carotenoids (e.g., lycopene), lignans, phytosterols, sulfides, isothyocyanates, phenolic compounds (including flavonoids, resveratrol, phytoestrogens, antho-cyanins, and tannins), protease inhibitors, capsaicin, vitamins, and minerals.

In addition to cancer prevention properties, fruits and vegetables provide fiber, which is the part of plants resistant to digestion by our enzymes. The other source of fiber is grain products, especially whole grains. Liberal intake of fiber helps prevent constipation, diverticular disease, hemorrhoids, irritable bowel syndrome, and perhaps colon polyps. Soluble fiber helps control blood sugar levels in diabetics. It also reduces LDL cholesterol levels, thereby reducing risks of coronary heart disease. Whether or not related to fiber, high fruit and vegetable intake may reduce the risks of coronary heart disease and stroke. Legume consumption in particular has been associated with a 10 to 20% lower risk of coronary heart disease, with the effective dose being around four servings per week.

Fiber and Whole Grains

Processed, refined grain products have much less fiber than do whole grains. For instance, white all-purpose enriched flour has only about one fourth the fiber of whole wheat flour. The milling process removes the bran, germ, and husk (chaff), leaving only the endosperm as the refined product, flour. Endosperm is mostly starch and 10–15% protein. Many nutrients are lost during processing. The germ is particularly rich in vitamins (especially B vitamins), polyunsaturated fatty acids, antioxidants, trace minerals, and phytochemicals. Phytochemicals protect us against certain chronic diseases. Bran is high in fiber and nutrients: B vitamins, iron, magnesium, copper, and zinc, to name a few. Enriched grain products are refined grains that have had some, but certainly not all, nutrients added back, typically iron, thiamin, niacin, riboflavin, and folate. Why not just eat the whole grain? Whole grain products retain nearly all the nutrients found in the original grain. Hence, they are more nutritious than refined and enriched grain products.

Liberal intake of high-fiber whole grain foods, as contrasted with refined grains, is linked to lower risk of death and lower incidence of coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. For existing diabetics, whole grain consumption can help im-prove blood sugar levels. Three servings of whole grains per day cut the risk of coronary heart disease by about 25 percent compared with those who rarely eat whole grains. Regular consumption of whole grains may also substantially reduce the risk of sev-eral forms of cancer.

Average adult fiber intake in the United States is 12 to 15 grams daily. Expert nutrition panels and the American Heart Association recommend 25 to 30 grams daily from whole grains, fruits, and vegetables.

The health benefits of the Mediterranean diet likely spring from synergy among multiple Mediteranean diet components, rather than from a single food group or one or a few food items.

Steve Parker, M.D.

April is Fitness Month: My Motivation

My wife, Sunny, decrees April to be Fitness Month.  No joke.

But it’s more than just fitness.  It’s about eating right, plus exercise.  No dining out for the entire month.  No junk food.  Renewed commitment to physical activity.

In the spirit of Fitness Month, I’m restarting my exercise efforts, which have been on hold for the last month.  I’ve simply been lazy.

I’m trying a new program based on resistance exercise and high-intensity interval training.  All in less than an hour a week.  To help me judge effectiveness, I’ve measured and recorded my baseline fitness.  I’ll re-measure every couple weeks or so.  After six or eight weeks, I’ll switch to a different program.

Exercise isn’t fun.  You need good reasons to do it.  Here are mine:

  • it keeps you young (fountain of youth)
  • longevity
  • less low back aching
  • injury resistance
  • keep my supraspinatous tendonitis (rotator cuff) in remission
  • prevention dementia, heart disease, and cancer
  • I’m a sheepdog, not a sheep
  • weight management
  • emergency preparedness (e.g., carry out an injured Boy Scout from a wilderness area)
  • more energy to enjoy life (hiking, camping, horseback riding, horse stall mucking, horse grooming, hay bale wrangling, long walks with others, etc.)

If you hope to exercise regularly, you’ll need your own list of reasons.  You’ll have days, weeks, or months when you just don’t want to exercise.  Review your list then.

Steve Parker, M.D.

PS:  This is my first post done on my new MacBook Pro.  Woo hoo!  I haven’t given any thought to sources of royalty-free photos to accompany posts.  Any ideas?  I’m used to MS Clip Organizer, which isn’t on this machine.

Coronary Artery Disease Declining In U.S.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported last year that the prevalence of self-reported coronary heart disease declined from 6.7% of the population in 2006, to 6% in 2010. Figures were obtained by telephone survey. Coronary heart disease, the main cause of heart attacks, remains the No.1 cause of death in the U.S.

Self-reports of heart disease may not be terribly reliable. However, I remember an autopsy study from Olmstead County, Minnesota, from 2001 that confirmed a lower prevalence of coronary heart disease there. I wrote about that at the NutritionData.com Heart Health Blog, but those posts may not be around much longer.

The CDC report mentioned also that mortality rates from coronary heart disease have been steadily declining for the last 50 years.

Improved heart disease morbidity and mortality figures probably reflect better control of risk factors (e.g., smoking, high blood pressure), as well as improved treatments. I’ve never seen an estimate of the effect of reduced trans fat consumption.

Obesity is always mentioned as a risk factor for heart disease, yet obesity rates have skyrocketed over the last 40 years. You’d guess heart disease prevalance to have risen, but you’d have guessed wrong. In view of high obesity rates, some pundits have even suggested that the current generation of Americans wil be the first to see a decrease in average life span.

The American Diabetes Association offers a free heart disease risk calculator, if you’re curious about your own odds. My recollection is that the calculator works whether or not you have diabetes.

Steve Parker, M.D.